Thoresby
  • Thoresby
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie Topic Starter
9 years ago
Hi everyone,

Can anyone tell me why there are no coalfields in places like Surrey, Hampshire, Devon and East Anglia?
Is it because those areas were solid ground, rather than swamp, in prehistoric Carboniferous times or is it that the whole of the UK is sitting on coal but that it's far too deep to mine beneath places like Surrey and Hertfordshire?
Look forward with interest to any replies.
Many thanks.
Roger L
9 years ago
Your best bet would be to look at the BGS site to see the composition of the ground formation in those areas. There are areas with no coal.

Mine Lectures & Walks available for around Huddersfield
legendrider
9 years ago
The British Isles is by no means a uniform geological entity. Coal measures are found more-or-less in places which alternated between shallow seas and swampy forest when our fair islands baked under a tropical sun around 300mya.

Looking now at the UK, the Scottish Highlands are part of a vast mountain belt running from northern Norway to the Applalachians, which predates the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, and just happened to have got stuck onto England instead of Newfoundland. The Lake District and Wales owe their existence to the tectonic upheavals which tore apart the supercontinent of Laurentia, whilst granitic Devon, Cornwall and the Scillies are but worn-down stumps of the vast Hercynian mountains which were thrown up by even more ancient spasms. And just for good measure, the ubiquitous Old Red Sandstone delineates a vast, iron-stained Devonian desert the size of Europe.

In short, Coal was formed under fairly fussy conditions which only persisted for a relatively small timescale, and fortunately for us, stuck around long enough and was accessible enough to be of the greatest utility to us in the Industrial Revolution.

MARK

festina lente[i]
Jimbo
  • Jimbo
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
9 years ago
This explains a lot plus the occurence map is good!:thumbup:

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/downloads/start.cfm?id=1404 
"PDHMS, WMRG, DCC, Welsh Mines Society, Northern Mines Research Group, Nenthead Mines Society and General Forum Gobshite!"
Graigfawr
9 years ago
This map reconstructing the broad geography of western Europe in Upper Carboniferous times shows land as dark stipple, shallow water and river plains of the coal measures as light stipple, and deeper oceans as white:

http://www.aditnow.co.uk/Photo/Map-Of-Western-Europe-During-Upper-Carboniferous_104903 

A belt of land extended from what is now central Wales to East Anglia. The south Wales, Forest of Dean, Bristol and Kent coalfields formed on the southern margin of this land mass. The north Wales, midlands, etc. coalfields formed on its northern margin.

The coalfields that formed south of the land mass would have been largely continuous originally but they are now separated by areas where the Upper Carboniferous deposits were subsequently eroded away. In some areas, such as Kent, the Upper Carboniferous deposits lie beneath younger rocks and form a "concealed coalfield". Similar erosion and over-stepping by younger deposits also occurred to the Upper Carboniferous deposits lying on the north margin.

The combination of there having been dry land across much of East Anglia (and hence no sediments being deposited in coastal swamps and shallow seas), and post-Carboniferous erosion, has resulted in there being no coal deposits in the areas you enquired about.

somersetminer
9 years ago
"Graigfawr" wrote:

The south Wales, Forest of Dean, Bristol and Kent coalfields formed on the southern margin of this land mass.



Ahem! I think you meant Somerset Coalfield, the 'Bristol pits' were always considered to be within this...

Disclaimer: Mine exploring can be quite dangerous, but then again it can be alright, it all depends on the weather. Please read the proper disclaimer.
© 2005 to 2023 AditNow.co.uk

Dedicated to the memory of Freda Lowe, who believed this was worth saving...