quite fascinating!
It is indeed fascinating. Without wishing to start a barney again on the subject it does seem to confirm that secondary mineralization in the oxide zone can be both malachite and azurite. This supports what Peter Williams says in “Oxide Zone Geochemistry” ( I believe the ‘bible’ on the subject). I quote:
These are not considered in the diagram (he is talking about complex hydrolysed species) as its purpose is simply to show how changing p(CO2) regimes may give rise to azurite, malachite or both crystallizing together at equilibrium with either cuprite or tenorite. I won’t say any more because inorganic chemistry I find about as complex as what a woman is thinking.
Anyway, Roy’s answer to my original question concerning this subject would appear to be correct. Now that is a surprise.
🙂
Just to add the Google update seems to have greatly improved the resolution of the area. I'm still looking for the manhole.
The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.