I see I will have to set the record straight here. Yes, I was one of the panners on the Wen, (I was a greenhorn in March 2009 when I had a brief course) but I was also blamed on a different forum for what several others had done. I wasn't there for 10 months straight, but from late March to mid June then a few weeks at a time until April this year. In this time I was visited by several EA officers after repeated complaints by a retired EA officer, and they never found any problem with me or the various panners who I was happy to invite to join in. I dug small holes and backfilled, though several others were digging big holes just above and below the bridge and didn't fill them in, using winches. I don't see a big problem with that, but I was blamed.
One professional panner and a geologist also praised my technique, so I thought I was following the rules. No one ever suggested that I was mining, and no official ever asked me to leave. The area I was in is access land, and I believed I was exercising my right to pan as a form of open air recreation. It seems to me that a few other panners are using the CCW's flawed approach to have a dig at me, whilst forgetting about the other panners who did the real damage. Over the years, a number of panners have been digging in the banks, using machines and mining in less visible spots. A few oldies are obviously annoyed that their secretive practices have been curtailed, and they like to put that down to me for working in the open. However, if I had done anything extreme, the CCW and forestry could have taken action against me individually. If the entire Wen and Mawddach are justifiably SSSIs and there is evidence that moving gravel could possibly damage any habitat, there should perhaps have been no panning there. However, CCW has no firm eco data to back up its 'sledgehammer', ie the signs banning panning, which are simply a threat of legal action. Any criminal case based on pearl mussels which don't exist on the Wen or Mawddach would fall apart, so the whole story is a con. CCW may even have misled police about the situation.
Panners should put their heads together and challenge the CCW to explain its knee jerk reaction, or they will be intimidated individually. I believe that Manic's comments were based on what others had told him, but this has led to misunderstanding of the situation by a few others who simply don't understand what had really happened. CCW and forestry plan to reintroduce panning at some point, initially they wanted to limit us to a trowel and pan, which would be as effective as a ban. However, having discussed the situation with a few officials more recently, they are willing to compromise. I just hope that the main panning association (whose members are mainly in Scotland) doesn't undermine our potentially strong negotiation position in Wales by going along with the exaggerated and even false stories of damage. With government cutbacks, police CCW and forestry may find their staff culled, so this whole exercise may have been a sabre wrattling exercise, to justify fairly ineffective jobs. Oh yes, perhaps CCW should prosecute the FC for the massive clear felling, which will lead to further silting up of the estuary. Dolgellau used to be a ship building town, so the entire estuary could justifiably be dredged. Bring in Rio Tinto, or set up a local dredging firm to make Dolgellau a rich town once again? Discuss.