bigchris
16 years ago
Mr Mike wrote:

Quote:

Unless I have been lead up the horse level, I believe that he was purely exhibiting at Bakewell to show his collection


As I said before, are the specimens on his website explicity marked "for sale" with prices next to them, also just for show? If not, then why should those at Bakewell, with prices, not also be for sale?
minerat
16 years ago
perhaps its time for a Nenthead Peace accord !!
be afraid.....very afraid !!!!
stuey
  • stuey
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
16 years ago
I was reading a fascinating book on "The Minerals of Devon and Cornwall", a British Museum publication. I gather there is one on the "oop north" district as well. It would probably be a good thing for the mouth breathers amongst us to read and get a bit of perspective about what goes on.

It has an important historical aspect, one which carries on today.

There has always been money in it, a lot of money in fact and at certain places, guards were put on to stop miners stealing minerals for sale to collectors. It's amazing how certain texts imply that miners were searched for minerals, some of them going to great lengths to escape along adits and up shafts. Dealers offering boots and tools for good specimens.

One of the reasons I can't turn my obsessive nature toward the pastime is that better samples have been through the smelters than I could imagine. I'm not a miner and the probabilities of striking something rich are pretty minimal.

A lot of minerals are better off in cabinets wherever, rather than either buried forever or ground up and smelted.

In the old days, there were those dedicated to their sports enough to pursue it, either being dedicated paupers, dancing with the law, or monied gents indulging their time/wealth. Either way, they added a huge amount of material to the matter of mineralisation/geochemistry/inorganic chemistry. I only read a paper recently that alluded to some obscure mineral being recently discovered.

A lot of museum collections are in fact the fruits of theft, unfairness, exploitation by people with thin morals, hellbent on profit and competetive greed. Sounds a bit like life really.

I find it difficult to believe how anyone going underground can not end up as an enthusiast of all aspects of mine exploring. From ropework to geology.

We all break all sorts of laws doing this sort of thing. Whether it be taking people into an ionising radiation environment, criminal damage to a grill, mineral theft, speeding whilst driving there, or a racist joke in the pub afterwards.

As Grampie Charlie said "The rules are for the strict obedience of everyone else and the guidance of me"

Moderation and tolerance being the key things.

I've noted as I've got more into the underground goings on of my area that people don't tend to go banging on about what they're up to. Flying under the radar springs to mind.

It's a shame really, as if there was no stigma, mouth-breathers wielding a bit of power in the form of draconian laws. We would probably share a lot more information for the better.

Anyway. Rock on!
moorlandmineral
16 years ago
"I've never been back to - vanadinite all over the place, which I could make a fortune out of if I was a dealer - maybe I'll go for a dig up there one day soon - under cover of darkness so other dealers don't see me visiting a Barstow shrine" - Skippy's penultimate contribution to this thread Mr Mike. Note the 'other dealer's' in this paragraph, not 'so dealers don't see me....', other dealers.... Think about that one. Looks like you were led up the Adit!!!

AR
  • AR
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
16 years ago
Well, Level1 and Moorlandminerals have both carefully skirted round the point of what if you don’t have permission to take, which was at the heart of two of my previous questions. In the building example, I somehow doubt a public interest defence would wash in court - “It’s like this your honour, the building was on the point of falling down so I felt it was my public duty to remove parts of it so they could be preserved for posterity. I would also like the court to consider that the money received from selling them to the salvage yard barely covered the costs incurred removing them…” As has been mentioned, a dealer has been offering for sale a specimen apparently recently removed from a site where the conditions of access state that only collecting for personal interest is allowed. If it’s got a price tag on it, then it wasn’t collected for personal purposes, it was collected for commercial purposes. Can any NHPT members comment on whether permission to remove mineral for resale was given in this case?

Also, the owner of the mineral rights is often not the landowner whose permission you get to go onto a site. Farmer Giles may well be the person to grant or refuse access to a mine but if he doesn’t own the mineral rights, then his agreement to material being removed from the veins does not give a legal right to take anything.

Just as a final comment before I go back to doing what I’m meant to be doing - I used to be pretty laid back about mineral collecting, and I used to pick up odd bits from the loose. The reason why I say “used to” lies mainly with the postings and behaviour of mineral collectors on this site…..

Follow the horses, Johnny my laddie, follow the horses canny lad-oh!
Vanoord
16 years ago
Some very good points in the above posts and this will assist in the development of a more structured suggested code of practice for the removal of minerals.

I think it might be worth pointing out (again!) that AditNow is not a mineral collecting website and that the site's interests lie in mining history and related industrial archaeology.

That's not to say that there is no cross-over between the different groups who explore mines, but it's certainly the case that there are some issues where there are irreconcilable differences.

It seems to me that if someone is removing material from a mine with the permission of the mineral rights owner and the site owner (if relevant), then it may not be our place to object.

If, however, that action needlessly damages the fabric of the mine or the historic artifacts within in, then it is something that I personally disagree with unless a proper assessment has been made and the artifact photographed, recorded and potentially moved.

The issue of the removal of small, loose items is less clear: it is, without permission, theft. Yet it's akin to picking up a pebble from a beach and could only be considered de minimis.
Hello again darkness, my old friend...
Mr Mike
16 years ago
So nice to have some calm, on a lighter note this just came to me....

What do you call a group of pissed up mineral collectors?

Chiselled!

Is this a non PC joke?
Mr Mike www.mineexplorer.org.uk
simonrl
  • simonrl
  • 51% (Neutral)
  • Administration
16 years ago
"AR" wrote:

Just as a final comment before I go back to doing what I’m meant to be doing - I used to be pretty laid back about mineral collecting, and I used to pick up odd bits from the loose. The reason why I say “used to” lies mainly with the postings and behaviour of mineral collectors on this site…..



One thing we're going to have to draw a clear distinction between in this policy is that between the small scale private collector / mineralogist who enjoys their hobby (usually in conjunction with an interest mining heritage and preservation) and abides by NAMHO guidelines, and the commercial mineral dealer. This is not the site for the latter group, and by and large it is members of that latter group who have caused the problems in this thread.
my orders are to sit here and watch the world go by
Peter Burgess
16 years ago
It might also be a good idea to recognise in any policy the possible consequences of what might be considered innocent actions.

Although related to caves rather than mines, I can relate a story of mineral removal from some years ago which under most circumstances might have been regarded as acceptable, but almost resulted in serious consequences.

A colleague was caving in a large active stream cave, which contains some very nice calcite decorations. He took a fancy to a piece of calcite that lay amongst the cobbles in the underground stream bed, where it had most likely ended up through entirely natural processes of flooding, ground movement etc. (BTW it wasn't Swildons Hole).

As the group returned from the cave entrance to base, the cavers were met by a representative of the landowner who took them to task for removing stalactites from the cave, and took the matter up with the regional caving body. The repercussions might have resulted in access being denied, but through the careful diplomacy of fellow cavers, the matter was taken no further.

In terms of minerals from mines, one might need to consider the seemingly innocent casual collection of broken loose specimens from the floor, and the consequence of subsequently being accused of deliberately removing native minerals when such action has been forbidden by the owner. Innocent actions can often be misconstrued to everyone's detriment.
sougher
16 years ago
I have refrained from entering into this debate until now, but with tongue in cheek can I make the following comments please!

Colonel Mustard wrote "In the old days minerals were extracted AFTER the mineral rights had been secured. Without those rights, the removal of any material from any mine is theft".

Well spoken Colonel. In Derbyshire from time immemorial up until the two Acts of Parliament (i.e. The High Peak Mineral Customs and Mineral Courts of 1851 and The Derbyshire Mining Customs and Mineral Courts Act, 1852) which legally confimed a lot of the old lead mining laws, there was drastic action that could be taken by the Barmote Court against theft of lead from lead mines within the King's/Queen's Field. Edward Manlove the Steward of the Court in the mid seventeenth century composed a poem "The Liberties and Customes of the Lead Mines within the Wapentake of Wirksworth in the County of Derby" which set out the laws and customs of the Derbyshire lead field called the King's/Queen's Field (depending upon the reigning monarch) in rhyme for the mostly illiterate miners to memorise. Below is an extract from the poem describing the punishment dealt out to "cavers" as the lead miners called thieves.

"And two great Courts of Barghmoot ought to be
In every year upon the minery,
To punish miners that transgress the Law,
To curb offenders, and to keep in awe
Such as be cavers, or do rob men's Coes,"

Further on in the poem the punishment is then described:-

"For stealing oar twice from the minery,
The Thief that's taken fined twice shall be,
But the third time, that he commits such theft,
Shall have a knife stuck through his hand to th' Haft
Into the Stow, and there till death shall stand,
Or loose himself by cutting loose his hand;
And shall forswear the franchise of the mine,
And always lose his freedom from that time."

Bloodthirsty somewhat? Makes one think.

These laws only applied to lead no other mineral, any other mineral mined apart from lead had to be left either below ground as "deads" or left on the surface for the mineral owner who was not necessarily the land owner to dispose of. It is in these old mining hillocks that much opencasting work has taken place from the early twenthieth century onwards to recover the associated minerals of the vein, i.e. calcite, barytes, fluorspar, zinc blende etc. etc. A separate topic needs starting up about the history of the Derbyshire King's/Queen's Field, the Barmote Court, the Officers of the Court, the Mining Liberties, the Duchy of Lancaster etc. etc., the subject is too vast and complicated to include on this topic.
..........................................

Stuey wrote "I'd say that collecting and ordering things was a fundamental feature of the male pattern mind...................
minerals allow you to do this sort of thing and I suppose it has the same features of other male hobbies".

There must be a number of FEMALE members including myself, of Aditnow, albeit in the minority. Please stop being sexist Stuey, why can't girls be interested in geology, mine and cave exploration etc, why are such interests labelled "male hobbies"?. I first became interested in geology at the age of eleven when I passed a scholarship to grammar school, studied geology at Derby Technical College after having left school at 16 - there being few openings for girls in the careers that I would have liked to have followed when I left school in 1948. My interest in mine exploration came about originally through collecting rock specimans for my geology course (yes, all of us must plead guilty at some time or other of doing this but way back in 1951 there were plenty of specimans to be found on the old mine spoil heaps called "hillocks" in Derbyshire, without despoiling mines and it wasn't for financial gain!), thus I became interested in industrial archaelogy, mining history etc. etc. I met many interesting people from all walks of life, especially in the spar mining industry. From my interest in mines and history Nellie Kirkham became a very good friend, she took me under her wing, she was a prime example of a female caver/mine explorer/historian. My knowledge of rocks and geology I passed onto my four children, two of my sons who work for a land reclamation firm find their knowledge of rocks and what is below ground very useful in their work. Being retired now I enjoy being a member of Aditnow, there are many people (both male and female) from all walks of life with a lot of knowledge and experience to offer on various topics, so please Stuey in future postings keep sexist remarks where they belong - off the board. Thank you.

................................................

Derrickman wrote "See also the thread elsewhere in this forum, about quarrying in the Peaks. I would come down firmly on the side that the lorry driver eating his chip-and-ketchup sandwich in a layby, sitting in his ARC owner-driver tipper's cab is AT LEAST as AUTHENTIC a piece of local mining history as an re-enactor in a 'Poldark' hat down in the museum at Matlock".

Being in Derbyshire, it wouldn't be a 'Poldark' hat a re-enactor would be wearing, it would in fact be a "BRADDA" hat! The village of Bradwell in the north of the Peak District was famous for the manufacture of felt hats worn by lead miners. In fact these hats provided the model for the soldiers tin hats of World War one, they were originally made at Sheffield. On many old photographs taken of Derbyshire lead miners in the nineteenth century many men are seen wearing a "Bradda" hat, they are very distinctive.
TimH
  • TimH
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
16 years ago
Details of the Smallcleugh SSSI are on Natural England's website - http://www.english-nature.org.uk/special/sssi/sssi_details.cfm?sssi_id=1005631 

Among the operations requiring NE's consent is 'Extraction of minerals'
minerat
16 years ago
nice post sougher...well said :thumbsup:
be afraid.....very afraid !!!!
minerat
16 years ago
some people on here are rabbiting on about consent from landowners and mineral rights owners with regards to collecting, got me wondering....do we all have permission to enter the mines we explore and are we trespassing entering them..are we commiting damage when we walk over loose deads which fall down, if so are we all breaking the law....just thought I would ask.
be afraid.....very afraid !!!!
jagman
  • jagman
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
16 years ago
"minerat" wrote:

some people on here are rabbiting on about consent from landowners and mineral rights owners with regards to collecting, got me wondering....do we all have permission to enter the mines we explore and are we trespassing entering them..are we commiting damage when we walk over loose deads which fall down, if so are we all breaking the law....just thought I would ask.



I'm sure its an innocent question
However, trespass is a civil non arrestable offence.
Quite different to the criminal offence of theft is it not?
AR
  • AR
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
16 years ago
"sougher" wrote:

A separate topic needs starting up about the history of the Derbyshire King's/Queen's Field, the Barmote Court, the Officers of the Court, the Mining Liberties, the Duchy of Lancaster etc. etc., the subject is too vast and complicated to include on this topic.



I'd say that needs a whole website of its own, not just a thread! Mind you, at some point when I've got access to a scanner I'll add some of the material I've got relating to the Peak mining laws, such as the reprint of Hopkinson's 1644 treatise on the laws, and a copy of the Stokes v. Arkwright case...
Follow the horses, Johnny my laddie, follow the horses canny lad-oh!
minerat
16 years ago
you didnt aswer all my questions jagman. trespass can at times be proved to be damaging, :thumbsup:
be afraid.....very afraid !!!!
simonrl
  • simonrl
  • 51% (Neutral)
  • Administration
16 years ago
"AR" wrote:

"sougher" wrote:

A separate topic needs starting up about the history of the Derbyshire King's/Queen's Field, the Barmote Court, the Officers of the Court, the Mining Liberties, the Duchy of Lancaster etc. etc., the subject is too vast and complicated to include on this topic.



I'd say that needs a whole website of its own, not just a thread! Mind you, at some point when I've got access to a scanner I'll add some of the material I've got relating to the Peak mining laws, such as the reprint of Hopkinson's 1644 treatise on the laws, and a copy of the Stokes v. Arkwright case...



Thanks AR, look forward to reading them :flowers:
my orders are to sit here and watch the world go by
Captain Scarlet
16 years ago
"minerat" wrote:

some people on here are rabbiting on about consent from landowners and mineral rights owners with regards to collecting, got me wondering....do we all have permission to enter the mines we explore and are we trespassing entering them..are we commiting damage when we walk over loose deads which fall down, if so are we all breaking the law....just thought I would ask.



Just to clarify one point, 'Collecting' is not the issue being disputed, but rather commercial harvesting and its resultant alleged damage.

STANDBY FOR ACTION!!!!...
simonrl
  • simonrl
  • 51% (Neutral)
  • Administration
16 years ago
"Colonel Mustard" wrote:

"minerat" wrote:

some people on here are rabbiting on about consent from landowners and mineral rights owners with regards to collecting, got me wondering....do we all have permission to enter the mines we explore and are we trespassing entering them..are we commiting damage when we walk over loose deads which fall down, if so are we all breaking the law....just thought I would ask.



Just to clarify one point, 'Collecting' is not the issue being disputed, but rather commercial harvesting and its resultant alleged damage.



Thank you Colonel.

I think I've made that point about 3 or 4 times now.

So, to commercial mineral dealers, in order to avoid further confusion on the point, I would suggest adding to your forum posting signatures that you are a commercial dealer of minerals, this will introduce a much needed level of transparency where dealers are hiding behind the label of collector.

Note, we of course draw a clear distinction between a commercial mineral dealer removing mineral samples where the mineral rights and access rights have been secured or agreed with their respective owners. As has been pointed out so many times that it is getting tedious, that is commonly referred to as a mine (e.g. Rogerley).
my orders are to sit here and watch the world go by
minerat
16 years ago
I wasn`t referr :thumbsup: ing to collecting, I was simply asking a couple of questions about "legalised access" to mining property and are we breaking the law, the collecting thing has run its course as far as I am concerned, it will get us nowhere only maybe what has been discussed in the past about groups "owning" a mine for their members only stuff, then we will all have to pay to join such clubs to pursue our hobbies of enjoyment and relaxation.
be afraid.....very afraid !!!!

Disclaimer: Mine exploring can be quite dangerous, but then again it can be alright, it all depends on the weather. Please read the proper disclaimer.
© 2005 to 2023 AditNow.co.uk

Dedicated to the memory of Freda Lowe, who believed this was worth saving...