Surprised to see how quickly these have been condemned without the benefit of having been tried/tested.
I'm not surprised at all, since (assuming that 3800mAh is even theoretically possible in AA NiMH, which seems debatable at best) if such capacities suddenly became possible by some massive breakthrough in materials, it'd be pretty unlikely that the first anyone heard about them was in the selling of a non-mainstream brand of cells on Ebay for £1/cell.
As it is, quality manufacturers seem to have pretty much topped out at a [claimed] 2700-2800mAh, with little change in the last N years, pushing current materials about as far as they can, and often sacrificing durability in the process compared to ~2000mAh cells.
On top of that, there have been claimed '3800mAh' cells around on ebay for a while, (some marked as fake Sony cells, others not but still using the sony grey/orange colour scheme) and the tests I've seen on those have shown them to be appallingly low quality fakes.
cpf is offline at the moment, but look at:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mJzOj2pMnJUJ:www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php%3Ft%3D163194%26page%3D1+nimh+3800mAh+ebay+aa+site:candlepowerforums.com&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.co.uk The chances of these suspiciously coloured '3800' being other than rubbish don't seem very good.
While I haven't bought any (yet) I do have some 3000mah batteries which I bought from ebay and they have served me well enough.
I'd bet that if you tested your '3000mAh' cells in a decent battery analyser, their capacity would be less than the label suggested, and not just by a little (even many quality cells are a bit 'overlabelled'), but by quite a lot.[i]