JohnnearCfon
17 years ago
I thought I would start this thread so the artifacts removal thread can be a discussion about a discussion about the ethics of artifact removal not ethics of mineral collecting!
hymac580c
17 years ago
I think mineral collecting from mines is ok as long as one does not do a lot of damage or make the area dangerous.
Bellach dim ond swn y gwynt yn chwibian, lle bu gynt yr engan ar cynion yn tincian.
Peter Burgess
17 years ago
I have picked up some minerals from mines I have visited, but almost always from rocks lying on the floor, and more times than not I am happy to just look at what there is and put it back again. I have a nice lump of galena from North Wales, and have no desire to collect any more as I doubt I will find a better specimen. The lump was loose on the floor and was not prised out of a wall. I got into mine exploration as a result of a collecting hobby, an interest which faded as I got more into the historical side of the places I was visiting. It is nice to be able to point out to people with me the minerals that were being mined, which I can continue to do as long as the minerals remain visible in the mines, rather than in a box in my attic or anyone elses come to that. Like artefacts, the minerals are part of the story of the mine and I believe there are enough good specimens out there on public display to last for a lifetime without me having my own private collection. The galena I have from North Wales serves as a desk ornament at work - a very useful paperweight! It serves as a daily reminder that I have a more interesting life outside the office!
hymac580c
17 years ago
I know nothing about minerals, nor of collecting. But I think the old mines are there for all interests. And I think it is wrong for one group to say 'this place is for us and for nobody else'. Unless of course you might own it.
People should respect the fact that other people have different interests and hobbies which relates to old mines and quarries. My interest is of exploration and of the history of mines/quarries. I have other hobbies and intests as well.
I can understand that other people will think differntly, but I respect their opinion, and understand they think and do things differently to me.
So I think we shall all have to learn to live with one another as far as mines and quarries are concerned.
But don't damage the mine, or make it dangerous. Leave it as it is for the next person to see. 😉
Bellach dim ond swn y gwynt yn chwibian, lle bu gynt yr engan ar cynion yn tincian.
JohnnearCfon
17 years ago
"AdrianP" wrote:


5) Where people take more specimens than they need to sell on to cover their transport costs! Yes I have had this argument presented to me. If a person is genuinely interested in minerals they will not need to supplement their income. Otherwise it becomes a business and, funnily enough, the Mines Inspector would then say it is a working mine and they would have to comply with all sorts of legislation!



Now that is an interesting thought! Just thinking off top of head, that would surely put additional responsibilities on the land (or mineral rights) owner. I could see that leading to additional mines being closed off for that reason alone!
jagman
  • jagman
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
After giving this subject considerable thought, I just don't care anymore. Sorry.
There are too many idiots out there who think ripping hoppers out in the persuit of a lump of shiney rock is acceptable. Everyone denies ever doing it, the only truth that matters is that somebody is doing it, they have for years and will continue to do so when it suits them.
Mr.C
  • Mr.C
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
"AdrianP" wrote:


snip
2) Extensive hammering of deposits destroys them for others. This is what happened to Blende Vein in Magpie Sough - I was on the first trip up after opening and the dogs tooth crystals were beautiful. Within 6 months they were trashed.
snip


What makes this worse IMHO, is that the crystals were flogged off for "beer money" to a local shop :curse:
We inhabit an island made of coal, surrounded by a sea full of fish. How can we go wrong.......
ICLOK
  • ICLOK
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
Once upon a time in another galaxy far far away....

CAVING

This was a hobby filled with brilliant people who had loads of respect for caves/mines and taught us nippers as we were then...
How to take a mineral sample without detriment to a mine...
How to look at an artifact and record it....
How too... well its a big list... but it was all good and involved a great BALANCE of understanding versus practicality.
We even took stuff but only if we thought it was in peril of being lost for ever(mineral/artifact) and evenm then we GOT IT WRONG!! but its a judgement call based on circumstances!

Amazingly we had people with a mineral bias, historical bias and even an artifact bias.... WE EVEN GOT ON.... why? because we talked and understood each other rather than taking ridiculous stanses!

Guys I keep hearing well reasoned arguments from both sides.... neither side accepting the removal of artifacts or mineral to the total detriment of a site...

Whats gone wrong then???

Its called idiots who don't care... they don't care what they steal, damage wreck,etc as long as they get the best samples or artifacts... its often about ££££'s, they don't contribute here or any where else so why are we busy chewing chunks out of each other when in reality we all know the problem lies at the extremes of whatever part of this hobby we follow.... they must be p**sing themselves with laughter at the division!

There have always been several angles on this hobby which the old duffers (as we saw them as young men) seemed to understand and we all got along fine... its called BALANCE and EDUCATION..... something that we all have a responsibility to pass on just like the old duffers in the PDMHS did for me.... it works and my kids both collect minerals to a degree and both understand conservation/preservation at 9 & 14 I'm proud say.

There is no fence for me to sit on as I was taught to understand the whole hobby which I think I do from Spoil Heap to Cave Pearl to a greater degree than I'm hearing here at times! Regardless of my freaky preference for engine houses.!!:thumbsup:
I was just pointed the right way in general how to behave so a bit of respect/understanding for each other might not go a miss....

The better angels of my soul tell me that most on here are decent concientious people.... not wreckers...

sorry for the rant ...

:surrender: :thumbsup:
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh Creeper!!!!!
carnkie
17 years ago
"ICLOK" wrote:

The better angels of my soul............
:surrender: :thumbsup:



Are we introducing a religous angle to the discussion?:ohmygod:
The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.
ICLOK
  • ICLOK
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
No.... :angel:
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh Creeper!!!!!
carnkie
17 years ago
I sometimes wonder about using the word ethics here because it seems to be being used in a slightly different context to the one I normally associate it with. Are we talking about moral duty to society as a whole or another quite separate discussion?
The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.
ICLOK
  • ICLOK
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
I don't remember ever having to worry re ethics as generally everyone understood something of the whole hobby and got on. Guess I'm old fashioned.... glad to say!

😉 :thumbsup:
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh Creeper!!!!!
carnkie
17 years ago
That's really the point I'm trying to make (rather badly as usual), if everone understands the ethics of their own particular hobby and their ethical responsibility to society as a whole (not always the case) then there shoudn't be a problem. But of course you can't legislate for idiots. What you tend to get with this discussion is not a clash of ethics but a clash of idealism. Don't know what brought this on, must be you mentioning the soul. :thumbup:
The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.
ICLOK
  • ICLOK
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
I just see the best in people generally, and people are not idiots that come on this site in general and am sure most have pretty good ethics re artifacts and minerals... the rest well they are the problem. Idealism is a big part of this but alas one mans meat is another mans poison.
I've very occasionally taken minerals out of mines but always from unobtrusive areas or off the floor with out detriment to the site... but I've also found clusters of cave pearls/ mineral and carefully hidden them from view in situ and kept stum as they look nice just were they are, I've certainly taken surface artifacts because I thought they were threatened... mostly quite rightly too preventing their destruction (and they have gone to local societies/museums not my lounge), but then again I've also took paint and wax oil etc to stuff to stop it deteriorating... My ethic is think about what you are doing and as long as its with the best intentions, not hurting anything/anybody else then fill your boots... and if you get it wrong occasionally then learn and don't do it again and were possible put it right. No one is perfect.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh Creeper!!!!!
Roy Morton
17 years ago
Hi all,
Been out of the loop for a while and I'm glad to say It's good to be back again.
On the subject of mineral removals, I'm sure this has been adequately dealt with in previous threads, however as new members join the same subjects will pop up from time to time.
The people that make me angry are the souvenir hunters... the ones that specifically target preserved mining sites. The two engines at South Crofty have both been targeted by these trophy hunting miscreants, and to what avail? Only the displeasure of the many when vital parts of the machinery goes missing to adorn a mantelpiece or cabinet.
:curse: :curse: :curse:
The brass dial counter/recorder which was housed in a wooden case on the wall in Robinsons pumping engine house at South Crofty, was ripped off the wall and has disappeared into someone’s 'collection'
Just recently the brass index plate from Robinsons Steam winding engine has been removed which in many ways is sad because the whole site is in the process of being restored and this engine is earmarked to run on steam once more. It’s in remarkable condition for its age, being built by Harvey’s of Hayle in 1882 and run on compressed air during the last years of South Crofty’s life for use when shaft maintenance was undertaken as the engine was very easy to control with precision.
If anyone should be offered this plate can they PM me with the details, confidence assured!!!.
The plate in question sat at the bottom of the forward / reverse control lever and was a radiused to fit between the now empty bolt holes seen either side of the lever.

🔗Personal-Album-342-Image-063[linkphoto]Personal-Album-342-Image-063[/linkphoto][/link]

"You Chinese think of everything!"
"But I''m not Chinese!"
"Then you must have forgotten something!"
ICLOK
  • ICLOK
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
Hi Roy, Thats my point, these are not 'Enthusiasts' they are thoughtless idiots and won't be the type to come on here as they put their need to have before the needs of the hobby. If any brasswork needs new castings making I will be happy to help if I can... please pass that on. Like you say this is tragic as they have survived so long. Nice to see you back..

Regs ICLOK :thumbsup:
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh Creeper!!!!!
Level1
  • Level1
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
What a wonderful irony that a thread that began on the topic of artefact removal morphed into one on mineral removal, and a thread that began about mineral removal has already attracted a post about artefact removal! :lol:

Having read Roy's post I note the word "brass" popped up twice when he described the items removed. This does make me wonder if the thieves were not "souvenier hunters" as Roy suggests. Copper and zinc prices are very high just now, and what is brass made from? A tour of the local scrapyards with pics of the missing items may shed light on their fate.
Peter Burgess
17 years ago
"Level1" wrote:

What a wonderful irony that a thread that began on the topic of artefact removal morphed into one on mineral removal, and a thread that began about mineral removal has already attracted a post about artefact removal! :lol:



An easy mistake to make, given the similarity of the topic titles.
Level1
  • Level1
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
"ICLOK" wrote:


Amazingly we had people with a mineral bias, historical bias and even an artifact bias.... WE EVEN GOT ON.... why? because we talked and understood each other rather than taking ridiculous stanses!

Guys I keep hearing well reasoned arguments from both sides.... neither side accepting the removal of artifacts or mineral to the total detriment of a site...

Whats gone wrong then???

Its called idiots who don't care... they don't care what they steal, damage wreck,etc as long as they get the best samples or artifacts... its often about ££££'s, they don't contribute here or any where else so why are we busy chewing chunks out of each other when in reality we all know the problem lies at the extremes of whatever part of this hobby we follow.... they must be p**sing themselves with laughter at the division!

...The better angels of my soul tell me that most on here are decent concientious people.... not wreckers...

sorry for the rant ...

:surrender: :thumbsup:



No ICLOK it was not a rant, but one of the better posts on this topic. Those who would rip out a hopper to get at a few crystals (to use Jagman's example) are just as bad as those who'd leave every crystal (even those NOT near historical artefacts) in the ground to be lost forever when the mine collapses, or poorly appreciated (because it is covered in dirt) by the few privileged enough to be able to get to it. Both groups annoy me 😠

As I keep saying we need COMPROMISE! Enough has been said in the other thread about this so I will not repeat it all here. A few points do merit comment though:

AdrianP refers to people making a business out of selling what they find. He can rest assured it is not a profitable one! Dealers (those who buy and sell) seem to be able (just) to scrape by, but your average collector is lucky to recoup costs, and as fuel prices soar that will continue to be the case. And for every collecting trip that pays its way (or even returns a little profit) there will be many others that fail. Overall they balance out, and probably lean to the debit side. I intend this only as a comment on the financial aspect. I am reticent to get into a debate on the ethics of collecting to sell. It is another can of worms that could keep a thread going for weeks, and I havn't the time!

It was commented on the other thread that this debate can get heated and ends up with the moderators moderating. Hopefully moderately. Both sides are passionate about their hobbies. To those on the anti-collecting side, I would say that the passion you feel about every last shot hole, or whatever, is the passion mineral buffs feel about minerals. Now how would you feel if various authorities, or individuals, came along and declared that you cannot indulge your interest anymore, or at least only in a manner so restricted it would render it as pointless as fishing without a hook on your line?
This is what is happening to the mineral buffs. It is coming from various quarters. The health & safety fascists have effectively closed off many of the quarries. And as for working mines - forget it. The archaeology brigade get restless about digging in tips. More and more sites are being designated SSSI's. Geoparks are spreading and bringing with them a much more "conservative" attitude to collecting, and especially selling, of minerals. The North Pennines Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty brigade have published an appalling "Geodiversity Audit and Action Plan" which repeatedly accuses collecting of being a "threat" to sites, without providing a jot of evidence, or acknowledging the very positive contribution collectors have made. And most notorious of all, the Lake District National Park Authority (LDNPA) have introduced a permit scheme that is so restrictive one might as well go out collecting with a teaspoon.
It is probably this last that has caused the greatest resentment amongst collectors. The fury and frustration it generated is hard to convey, but mention it to collectors and they will variously groan and sigh, or start foaming at the mouth and denouncing the intransigent bigots at the LDNPA. It has probably done more to polarise opinions amongst collectors into militantly pro versus "collaborators" who would "sell out" to the authorities, than any other issue of recent years. The mineral literature and blogs have been full of comment on the LDNPA as heated as any here. The LDNPA has been repeatedly challenged to substantiate its claims that collectors (the very people responsible for most of the discoveries in the Caldbecks over the years) are a threat to the mineral resource, and they have failed miserably to do so. In fact they generally simply ignore, or evade such challenges.
I do not want to go into all the arguments here, they have been well enough rehearsed already, but I ask the "anti" collecting side to consider how they would feel in the mineral collectors' shoes? For years you pursue your hobby. You act responsibly, asking permission, recording your discoveries etc. A few cowboys cause occasional trouble, but everyone accepts that they are not representative, and refrains from tarring all with the same brush. And this status quo prevails for decades. Then the problems I list above begin. Some, like health & safety, you can do little about. But others, like the LDNPA may be amenable - you think. So you try to reason with your opponents. They will not listen. Or they listen and then ignore everything said. You ask for proof. They have none, only opinions and unsubstantiated and generalised accusations. You refute their arguments. They don't care. Despite years of meetings and discussions you end up stuck with a restrictive scheme, that completely hobbles your hobby, and it is held up as a shining example of how your hobby should be done. An example for other authorities and landowners to follow.
An analogy would be explorers suddenly being told they can venture no further than 50 metres into a mine, and only certain kinds of mine, on pre-arranged days of the year, and without leaving footprints, on some spurious pretext that does not withstand scrutiny. You'd be :curse: wouldn't you?
Well that is how many collectors feel at the minute. There are some now who have given up trying to reason with the closed-minded and will simply put two fingers up at anyone who starts telling them what they can or cannot do. It is not because they don't give a damn about others' interests. They do. They are just fed up with what they see, correctly, as unjustified attacks on their hobby and will not take any more. So when they get called names by some in this forum (the word "scum" comes to mind), do not be surprised if they respond like a bull to a red flag and a slanging match ensues. Thankfully this time it seems to have remained more gentile, and I hope the moderators will not need to start moderating. 🙂
Level1
  • Level1
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
17 years ago
Whenever two sides have interests they imagine might conflict it helps if each has an understanding of the other's interests. Maybe some here would benefit from looking at websites by ordinary collectors. Then, perhaps, they could get a better feel for what it is all about.

www.campylite.com is one such that, I think, conveys something of the "thrill of the chase", as it were, in hunting for specimens, as well as the beauty and interest involved. There is a great picture of a vug in situ of the mineral campylite, but at the same time superb photos of specimens properly cleaned and presented. One look at the difference should convince all but the die-hards that minerals cannot be appreciated underground as they can be above ground.

This is not the only site, and a little surfing should soon throw up more. The links page of www.ukminingventures.com is a good place to start. The mere fact that so many amateurs enthusiastically describe their finds on their own websites, or post pics in databases like www.mindat.org shows that they are not all selfish, hoarding specimens away out of sight, but are eager to share. The amount of mining history material and photos of mining remains and heritage on their sites also speak volumes. We are not all rapacious vandals, and we do care!
🙂

Disclaimer: Mine exploring can be quite dangerous, but then again it can be alright, it all depends on the weather. Please read the proper disclaimer.
© 2005 to 2023 AditNow.co.uk

Dedicated to the memory of Freda Lowe, who believed this was worth saving...