christwigg
10 years ago
Seems like one of the stories to insight "fury" and "outrage" in the comments sections of newspaper websites.

"First they came for Coniston Water. What's next?"
Grabs the attention doesn't it.

Interesting to see a map of ownership of the lake which shows the vast majority already privately owned.

http://www.lakedistrict.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/171747/coniston_map_2009.pdf 
Morlock
  • Morlock
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie Topic Starter
10 years ago
"christwigg" wrote:

Seems like one of the stories to insight "fury" and "outrage" in the comments sections of newspaper websites.

"First they came for Coniston Water. What's next?"
Grabs the attention doesn't it.



My first thoughts exactly.

Hopefully any mine related stuff will stay 'as is' whilst the tourists enjoy their water sports.;D

exspelio
10 years ago
A particularly sensationalist and ill-informed report, the majority of land in national parks is privately owned and has been since the days before national parks, the NPA's still maintain the authority over planning and development. I suspect that most of these parcels are also covered by CRoW so access cannot be threatened either.
Always remember, nature is in charge, get it wrong and it is you who suffers!.
christwigg
10 years ago
If you think the article is bad, you should read some of the comments.

Wasn't too long before someone blamed it on immigrants.....

Morlock
  • Morlock
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie Topic Starter
10 years ago
"christwigg" wrote:

Wasn't too long before someone blamed it on immigrants.....



Would not be surprised to find UKIP or Russia were in the comments somewhere.
Graigfawr
10 years ago
Quote from LDNP on the BMC article about the sales (which are not confined to this NP):

"Martin Curry, the Lake District NPA’s property services manager, argues that the sale of sites like Stickle Tarn will have little implication in practice. “Less than 4 per cent of land in the national park is actually owned by the NPA,” he says, “so land doesn’t have to be owned by us in order to be protected. Any properties we sell will either be sold with their existing access or with strengthened public access. And all the property that is CRoW access land will obviously continue to be open for access.”
Willy Eckerslyke
10 years ago
Interesting view from the LDNP.
I felt the same when the National Trust ran a huge (and successful) campaign to buy Snowdon a few years back. They claimed they'd be "saving" it for the nation but nobody ever explained what it needed saving from.
"The true crimefighter always carries everything he needs in his utility belt, Robin"
RJV
  • RJV
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
10 years ago
A preemptive measure no doubt. To ensure that nobody tries to build a tea shop on top of one of Britain's highest mountains...
Willy Eckerslyke
10 years ago
"RJV" wrote:

A preemptive measure no doubt. To ensure that nobody tries to build a tea shop on top of one of Britain's highest mountains...


:lol::lol::lol:
"The true crimefighter always carries everything he needs in his utility belt, Robin"
Peter Burgess
10 years ago
... or a railway, copper mine, or slate quarry!

Disclaimer: Mine exploring can be quite dangerous, but then again it can be alright, it all depends on the weather. Please read the proper disclaimer.
© 2005 to 2023 AditNow.co.uk

Dedicated to the memory of Freda Lowe, who believed this was worth saving...