Regarding sizes and weights/thikness of slates,it is largely due to practical reasons that slate is more popular in thinner sizes.A ton of thin slates ,if all uniform size will cover a greater square area than the same wieght of thicker slates.In other words,1000 thick slates take more space to back,and require more haulage cost than the same number of thin slates.Also for handling,and carrying up a roof you could carry 20 countess`slates up a ladder,but if the same sive slates are say twice as thick you are not going to be so fast.If you are into stone slab roofing,you would only be able to carry 1 up a ladder if it was say 2ft x 3ft.Also lighter slates as opposed to thick slabs,are ideal when british practice is to use as little wood in roof construction:In scotland and america roofs are boarded to carry the weight of snow,where as in england and wales roofs are battened.Generally when slate arrive to a job thy are `sorted into 3 or 4 groups,according to the slight differences in wieght,thus enabling slates to lay flat.If you put a thick slate by a thinner one you have what is known in the trade as a `laugher`.