Cutting all this rubbish to the bare minimum.....
With anything, you have a bunch of data and a methodology for analysing the data and ascertaining it's significance....
Anyone with a half decent education can see and nod at the conclusions. They make sense, they follow a process, they are not rocket science or mystical.
The rubbish that the biased and UN funded IPCC come up with has no significant data, nor does it have a methodology. What it does have is a bunch of people following a thread with almost religious fervour, determined to prove their points. Sadly, science still operates on the data/methodology critique, in order to have some order of credibility. It's not what you hear on the news.......
I've worked alongside ex-IPCC staff as well as another guy who is making a lot of fuss about the oceans. Having an in depth chat to them about their methodology/data leads me to believe they have little to add to the subject, apart from their very large politically weighted soapboxes.
In my opinion, anthropogenically driven climate change is a noble lie, governed by the seriousness of peak oil. Conservation of resources, in order to maintain civilisation is one thing.... bleating on about things that make plant food gas is at best, the politics of envy and hippies hating the owners of half decent cars, or at worst, a pseudo religious bunch of godless freaks, desperately seeking some sort of meaning on planet earth and directly influencing my frigging life with their non-data non-methodoloical bullshizzle forcing me to grow a wind turbine and stop eating meat.
This crap will be proven for what it is, as there are allready correlations in the data which speak for themselves and will prove themselves right, whereas increasing concentrations of tax-gas will do nothing to the climate whatsoever.
Wait and see.
As a proper scientist, I will change my mind according to the evidence, for instance, if god shows up right now, I will cease being an athiest, however, these people have a point to prove and are merely delving deeper into jargon and models in order to prove their non-data backed up point...