Whether mining museums get the thumbs up or not from significant numbers of visitors probably depends on just one or two key features.
1. Is there something significant to visit underground?
2. Are there trains?
......and there lies the problem with Haig. The previous operators, Haig Pit Restoration Group, had a vision of running a railway and providing a simulated u/g tour. Track was acquired, locos were being restored, and the former Seaham training face (arches, sheeting, gate end boxes, AFC, chocks, etc) was donated by Woodhorn. Then, in 2003, the committee acquired themselves criminal convictions for H &S offences and had to resign. The new board of trustees (business, finance and tourism "experts"), with no mining experience or knowledge, and dare I say it .....interest, as one of their first actions condemned the track and arches as scrap (because "it was rusty") and sold them as such to help with costs. A bit like starting, say, a joinery business and selling all your tools to pay the workshop electric bill.
Since then a visitor centre - which, because of the funding source, seems to show how grateful we should be for no longer having to toil in muck and danger when electricity can be provided by much safer and greener nuclear (Sellafield down the coast) and wind (visible at Robin Rigg just outside) has been built. A plastic, sanitised, interpretation of what non-miners think we got up to (parading banners, whippet and pigeon racing, when not striking or being blown to kingdom come) is now available in the refurbished engine houses, but not much on technology or geology (a displayed coal measures plant fossil is, believe it or not, labelled as "at least one million years old":lol:)
Last year I was shown some correspondence by someone wanting the simplest of mining information from them - three shaft locations - with which they "could not help" as "we are not, and never have been, a research organisation". I took him to the site of two, less than a half mile from the museum, and showed him on plan the other - less than 200yds from the museum - and, yes, the museum does have plans, several in fact, showing all three of them.
Yes, they do have problems, some financial as stated in the article, but the bigger ones seem to be justifying the description of themselves as a
mining museum. More needs to be done than providing cash o continue as before.