it's long been the case here.
It's because we have a tax regime of long standing which does not encourage investment, a banking system which has completely abandoned the concept of 'duration of return' in favour of the next quarters' results, a bi-polar, adversarial electoral system which for the past 30 years has been debased to an arena in which two radically opposed ideologies have fought each other to exhaustion instead of running the country, a class of professional politicians who graduate straight from student union posturing to government.
I was listening to Any Questions on Friday, with various ideologues posturing about the question of MP's pay. I don't happen to think that a salary in the £60 - 100,000 range is excessive for a senior MP, or £60,000-plus for a long-established back-bencher on Committees; but why is it automatically acceptable for the schoolgirl recently returned at Norwich? And not one of them questioned this....
we also have far too many lawyers in parliament who are primarily interested in nit-picking and the most slavish and literal interpretation of laws which our European opposite numbers treat as a pick-and-mix counter to dip into as they see fit, and ignore as they suit.
our bi-polar politics mean that no-one dare challenge the shibboleth of the client state of benefit dependents, swollen tertiary education of ever-decreasing value and unproductive public sector employees.
apart from that, we have no problems...
''the stopes soared beyond the range of our caplamps' - David Bick...... How times change .... oh, I don't know, I've still got a lamp like that.