well, quite so. What does the tourist beach have to do with it? That scrappy old airfield isn't part of the tourist beach, is it?
The key problem has been highlighted with reference to Crofty. Cornwall is a restricted geographical area with very different views of what is, or isn't, the best way forward. There is a great deal of nostalgia and general baggage clouding the view, as evidenced by the BBC programme 'Tin Men' , and a LOT of people with agenda of varying descriptions.
the historic industry has a pretty hideous track-record for contamination and general mess, look at United Downs, or the Red River as it was not SO many years ago, or the stuff Geevor used to chuck into the sea, or the relatively recent Wheal Jane water mitigation works.
If you don't have a major financial backer, and a large site which is pretty much destroyed to begin with and well off the tourist route, I can't see how you could expect to get through the maze of planning, environment all the rest of it, to develop a mining prospect of any commercial value. Crofty appears to tick both boxes, but they aren't home and dry yet, not by a long way.
no, if Geevor decided it wasn't worth doing at a time when they had money to spend and the skills available, then either it is a dead issue or it requires a complete rethink and a total redevelopment.
the days of mining for tax deductions and development grants on the grand scale are gone. It maybe worth someone's while to spend a bit on pottering about to offset some tax, but I'd suspect that's about it
''the stopes soared beyond the range of our caplamps' - David Bick...... How times change .... oh, I don't know, I've still got a lamp like that.