Vanoord
  • Vanoord
  • 54.4% (Neutral)
  • Newbie Topic Starter
13 years ago
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-mid-wales-16202544 

Edited highlights:

Quote:

A mine pollution project could be rolled out across Wales after harmful metals entering a Ceredigion river fell by 99%.

Cwm Rheidol mine, near Aberystwyth, has historically discharged large amounts of zinc and other metals, which can harm fish, into the River Rheidol.

The Environment Agency said a filter of compost, limestone and cockle shells had helped pollution levels plummet.

The pilot aims to bring the Rheidol's water quality up to EU standards.

Cwm Rheidol mine has been abandoned for nearly a century and is connected to several other mines, all of which drain into the river.

The Environment Agency said last year the river had a relatively high concentration of zinc, which put it in danger of not reaching a "good ecological status" target by 2015.

Toxic metals are being removed from the mine water before it enters the Rheidol, using an environmentally-friendly method that requires no energy source apart from gravity.

Results from the last 12 months show removal rates of up to 99% for zinc, lead and cadmium, which are harmful to marine wildlife.


The treatment system was designed by Newcastle University.

It consists of large tanks which contains a mixture of compost, cockle shells and limestone.

The bacteria within this mixture removes metal from the water.

In the past the method has successfully removed iron from coal mine waters, but this is the first time it has been used to treat water passing through old metal mines.


Mining took place in Cwm Rheidol from the Bronze Age to just before World War I.

A filter system was developed in latter years, but the Environment Agency said it did not work and polluted water from the mine was still ending up in the River Rheidol.

In the UK, no-one can be held liable for the pollution from mines that were abandoned before 1999, including all the lead, zinc and copper mines in west Wales.


Hello again darkness, my old friend...
JohnnearCfon
13 years ago
Sounds an impressive result. It says the only energy source required is gravity, does this mean the filter does not need replacing from time to time?
Vanoord
  • Vanoord
  • 54.4% (Neutral)
  • Newbie Topic Starter
13 years ago
"JohnnearCfon" wrote:

Sounds an impressive result. It says the only energy source required is gravity, does this mean the filter does not need replacing from time to time?



Plus, of course the cost of installing the thing in the first place - about £ 1/2 million?
Hello again darkness, my old friend...
jagman
  • jagman
  • 50.2% (Neutral)
  • Newbie
13 years ago
"JohnnearCfon" wrote:

Sounds an impressive result. It says the only energy source required is gravity, does this mean the filter does not need replacing from time to time?



If its anything like other set ups I've seen there are no filters in the conventional sense.
The effluent is neutralised rather than filtered.
Rheidol38
13 years ago
The filter material would probably require changing over time as the metals are being removed from the water. I don't believe the timescales have yet been assessed. The trial was just to see if the system worked and could be implemented on a larger scale. Some of the money came from European funding and the total amount spent was previously published at something like £230k, although alot of this money was actually spent pipeing the water from inside the two adits to the valley floor - the quantity of water previously leaving the adits was greater than the quantity entering the ex CEGB filter beds suggesting there was water loss through the old tips. This allowed the water to pick up even more toxic metals before it entered the Rheidol.
rufenig
Manicminer
13 years ago
The 98 tonnes of zinc, lead and cadmium removed every year must be worth something to offset the cost?
Gold is where you find it
John Mason
13 years ago
People might be interested in the incredibly dirty job that Simon Hughes and I had in preventing the bottom or No.9 adit blowing out and sorting out the underground drainage in the top or No. 6 adit back in the early 1990s. Some time ago, I put a three-page account online at:

http://www.geologywales.co.uk/cwmrheidol.htm 

This work essentially prepared the way for the recent project.

Interesting point Manic - I understand that the quantity of zinc amounted to many tonnes/year so recovery of that and other elements, if economical, would offset some of the costs.

Cheers - John
Tamarmole
13 years ago
"John Mason" wrote:

People might be interested in the incredibly dirty job that Simon Hughes and I had in preventing the bottom or No.9 adit blowing out and sorting out the underground drainage in the top or No. 6 adit back in the early 1990s. Some time ago, I put a three-page account online at:

http://www.geologywales.co.uk/cwmrheidol.htm 

This work essentially prepared the way for the recent project.

Interesting point Manic - I understand that the quantity of zinc amounted to many tonnes/year so recovery of that and other elements, if economical, would offset some of the costs.

Cheers - John



A fascinating read.
Graigfawr
13 years ago
When I worked with Welsh Water's Scientific Services (predecessor of National Rivers Authority, now the Environment Agency) in 1985-86 on monitoring Cwmrheidol and on preliminary proposals for ameliorating its polluting discharges, the total zinc emmanating from Level 6, Level 9 and leacing from the dumps averaged around 50kgs per day or around 20 tones a year (daily figures fluctuated considerably depending on rainfall - anything from 20kgs to 200kgs per day). If I recall correctly, lead levels were around one-fifth the levels of zinc (i.e. around 10 kgs a day / 4 tonnes a year), and cadmium were less than one-tenth the levels of zinc (i.e. around 5 kgs per day / 1.5 tonnes a year). In total this amounts to around 25 tonnes a year. I can't recall how much iron was contained in the effluent though its levels also reflected rainfall and rates of through-flow.

The quoted figure of 98 tonnes a year may reflect either a radical change in the hydrology of the mine or a worst-case calaculation based on the worst individual days magnificed to annual levels, or iron as well as zinc/lead/cadmium?

The spent filter medium is likely to be sufficiently different to the usual types of zinc/lead/cadmium bearing wastes that reprocessors might well offer very little for it or charge for reprocessing it. At the very least, its large volume compared to its reclaimable metallic content may tip it from being an asset to be sold, to a liability that has to be subsidised to be disposed of. Nevertheless, its metallic content will very likely defray at least part of its processing costs.

A 1975 plan of Level 9 prepared when Rheidol Vale Properties proposed to drill from within the level states that the level was blocked by a major fall 500 ft from the portal. It also states that the tramway was 1' 11.5" gauage and that there were eight steel rings at three foot centres between the portal and rock head - do these details tally with what you and Simon found on site John?

More general plans of the mine prepared at the same time (undoubtedly based on older plans as most of the mine was inaccessible) show a pair of closely spaced winzes approximately 200ft west of Level 6 crosscut, descending from Level 6 on what was termed the South Lode to Level 9 on the South Lode. Presumably the water referred to in John's fascinating account was descending one or both of these winzes. (The two apparently seperate lodes named on old plans appear to actually be the south and north sides of one very wide lode which is up to 150 feet wide).

The Bwlchgwyn stream has repatedly sunk into the stopes on the top of the mine. Either Welsh Water or the county council installed concrete channels in about 1984 to carry the stream across areas where it was sinking but finances limited the extent of the work and it did not completely solve the problem even then. As John's photos eloquently showed, the stream found new places to sink into the stoped-out ground. Presumably the stream had been diverted and/or channelled across these areas in the nineteenth century to stop it sinking into the workings.
John Mason
13 years ago
I've done a better version now with bigger images:

http://www.geologywales.co.uk/storms/cwmrheidol-mine.htm 

The page title is a wry rebuttal to an anonymous Internet commentator busy stereotyping environmentalists, some 14 months ago BTW!

We did not go that far into No.9, because of bad air, and somebody who did venture further in some time later had to be helped out. The description of the arched part sounds accurate to me though and the inrush of scree occurred close to where that met rockhead.

I haven't been up to the top for some time and must take a look one day. The big, big worry expressed by Simon and I years ago was if the Tuen broke into the workings - if that was the mess that Nant Bwlchgwyn made, imagine what would happen? Whether that issue has been addressed I do not know.

Cheers - John
Morlock
13 years ago
Interesting write-up, nice pics. 🙂

Disclaimer: Mine exploring can be quite dangerous, but then again it can be alright, it all depends on the weather. Please read the proper disclaimer.
© 2005 to 2023 AditNow.co.uk

Dedicated to the memory of Freda Lowe, who believed this was worth saving...